Pic:

Black Monarch wrote:
Threads I've derailed: 0
Flame wars I've started: 0
Threads I've started that mentioned other posters by name: 0
Accounts I've created for the sole purpose of mocking other posters: 0

My reputation is clean.

LOL.

The image is mediocre at best, but your new signature made me roll on the floor laughing.

rijndael wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Threads I've derailed: 0
Flame wars I've started: 0
Threads I've started that mentioned other posters by name: 0
Accounts I've created for the sole purpose of mocking other posters: 0

My reputation is clean.

How dare you.

Whether it's conscious or not, you're a fucking troll and this board is worse off with you posting here. Every thread you start is cancer.

pan0phobik wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Whether it's conscious or not, you're a fucking troll and this board is worse off with you posting here. Every thread you start is cancer.

I don't get it - Kazzak was confirmed to be kiteable into SW in vanilla?

teebling wrote: ↑

5 years ago

I don't get it - Kazzak was confirmed to be kiteable into SW in vanilla?

But not in 1.13; the devs specifically stated that he'd be on a hard leash, but that we were free to try kiting other world bosses.

rijndael wrote: ↑

5 years ago

The image is mediocre at best, but your new signature made me roll on the floor laughing.

It's a shame that there isn't a recently created and currently active thread specifically for discussing signatures.

pan0phobik wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Whether it's conscious or not, you're a fucking troll and this board is worse off with you posting here. Every thread you start is cancer.

Black Monarch wrote: ↑

5 years ago

teebling wrote: ↑

5 years ago

I don't get it - Kazzak was confirmed to be kiteable into SW in vanilla?

But not in 1.13; the devs specifically stated that he'd be on a hard leash, but that we were free to try kiting other world bosses.

Source on this?

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... ama/260760

or

https://www.icy-veins.com/forums/topic/ ... gust-20th/

teebling wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Source on this?

link

 Blizzard Entertainment

---

Kazzak has a hard leash in 1.12. But there are other bosses in the world that do not!

Black Monarch wrote: ↑

5 years ago

https://www.icy-veins.com/forums/topic/ ... gust-20th/

Okay found it:

 Blizzard Entertainment

---

Kazzak has a hard leash, but you will still be able to kite certain world bosses to capital cities

Why is Kazzak being hard leashed then and not other world bosses? Because he’s so close to Stormwind?

The short answer is "because that's the way it was in 1.12"

As for why that's the way it was in 1.12, I can only guess that it had something to do with kazzak becoming more powerful as he fought larger numbers of players, making him especially devastating when brought to any capital city.

teebling wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Black Monarch wrote: ↑

5 years ago

https://www.icy-veins.com/forums/topic/ ... gust-20th/

Okay found it:

 Blizzard Entertainment

---

Kazzak has a hard leash, but you will still be able to kite certain world bosses to capital cities

Why is Kazzak being hard leashed then and not other world bosses? Because he’s so close to Stormwind?

https://classic.wowhead.com/spell=15245 ... olt-volley + https://classic.wowhead.com/spell=21053/capture-soul
1000 damage massive aoe that ignores LoS + heal for 70000 for each player killed

pan0phobik wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Whether it's conscious or not, you're a fucking troll and this board is worse off with you posting here. Every thread you start is cancer.

You hurt my feelings
How dare you

Can we just vote this guy off of the island? He is a moron. Low effort posts. Nothing productive comes out of this user ever... Just a terrible addition to the community.

Stfuppercut wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Can we just vote this guy off of the island? He is a moron. Low effort posts. Nothing productive comes out of this user ever... Just a terrible addition to the community.

Barrens chat isnt a democratic process and ad hominems are a weak way of expressing yourself.

Log off.

Undeadlock wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Barrens chat isnt a democratic process and ad hominems are a weak way of expressing yourself.

That wasnt an ad hominem because we werent engaged in discourse... I was just saying that he is a moron. Which is a fact. He is a moron. I didnt say he was a moron to deflect a conversation or redirect the topic. This is a statement.

Nice alt account by the way.

Stfuppercut wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Undeadlock wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Barrens chat isnt a democratic process and ad hominems are a weak way of expressing yourself.

That wasnt an ad hominem because we werent engaged in discourse... I was just saying that he is a moron. Which is a fact. He is a moron. I didnt say he was a moron to deflect a conversation or redirect the topic. This is a statement.

Nice alt account by the way.

An ad hominem is used to attack ones character rather than address the argument or point he made.
Dictionary definition doesnt say anything remotely relative to argument you made.

Also this isnt alt account, try hard.

For https://classic.wowhead.com/npc=12960/christi-galvanis sake just give this https://classic.wowhead.com/npc=4474/rotting-cadaver his precious level 60 already so he finally stfuppercuts for good !!!

Uncle Ganus McAnus wrote: ↑

5 years ago

For https://classic.wowhead.com/npc=12960/christi-galvanis sake just give this https://classic.wowhead.com/npc=4474/rotting-cadaver his precious level 60 already so he finally stfuppercuts for good !!!

Stfuppercut wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Can we just vote this guy off of the island? He is a moron. Low effort posts. Nothing productive comes out of this user ever... Just a terrible addition to the community.

Nothing good comes out of these online witch-hunts. You can disagree with the man but if he ain't breaking rules let him post what he wants.

I have a radical solution for you: Don't read or reply to his posts if you are so triggered.

Blizzard justifies keeping hard leash on Kazzak by saying it was that way in 1.12, yet they didnt introduce fucking keyring into the game. Blizzard decision-making makes me laugh, sometimes cry.

Faendor wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Blizzard justifies keeping hard leash on Kazzak by saying it was that way in 1.12, yet they didnt introduce fucking keyring into the game. Blizzard decision-making makes me laugh, sometimes cry.

That's different, one thing is a philosophy deccission and the keyring didn't made the cut just for release but they are planning on adding it.

daisyKutter wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Faendor wrote: ↑

5 years ago

Blizzard justifies keeping hard leash on Kazzak by saying it was that way in 1.12, yet they didnt introduce fucking keyring into the game. Blizzard decision-making makes me laugh, sometimes cry.

That's different, one thing is a philosophy deccission and the keyring didn't made the cut just for release but they are planning on adding it.

I dont understand, how is that different? It is just stupid not to have it in. For what reason would you postpone such feature? My point was that they said they wanna keep things how they were in patch 1.12 and keyring was present at that time. Even if it wasnt, why would you not introduce it, it is just a simple qol feature that noone would argue about.

They forgot and when people asked for it they decided releasing the game without it to not delay the already set release date