Alterac Valley
User avatar
Bnet:

solidlobster


Posts: 64
Likes: 104
Troll Priest 64 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

 Blizzard Entertainment
At BlizzCon 2018, we talked about how we plan to keep loot trading in World of Warcraft Classic. We added loot trading in Wrath of the Lich King to solve a common problem: a player could accidentally loot an item meant for another player or give it to the wrong person using Master Loot. They would then have to contact Blizzard to get the item moved to the intended recipient, which might take days. We wanted to keep loot trading in WoW Classic because the end result is the same – the correct person gets the item – and it’ll save everyone time.

But we heard your concerns about the potential for abuse of the loot trading system in parties of five. It’s possible that abusive play could take the form of a group of four players colluding to deny loot to a stranger who joined their party as a pick-up. Raid groups, being much larger, come with more understanding on the part of solo players that loot distribution can depend on the whims of the many players and raid leaders who know each other.

Taking that into consideration, we’ve decided that the two-hour loot trading system in WoW Classic will only apply to soulbound gear that drops in raids. Soulbound loot that drops in five-person content will not be tradeable at any time. What we hope to do is to strike a balance between saving players time and minimizing the potential for abuse of the system. We think this approach better addresses the concerns we’ve heard from players on the subject.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... sic/131586

"Ya got my attention."

ImageImage
Priest Holy
User avatar
Posts: 7
Likes: 5
Horde Priest 7 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Definitely a good compromise, will help with PUG dungeon loot abuse and can help protect misclicks from master loot.

   s1atan
Winterspring
User avatar
Guild:

Senile Chieftains


Bnet:

s1atan#2841


Posts: 262
Likes: 195
Horde 262 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Great decision by blizzard. I like it!

Image
Priest Holy
User avatar
Posts: 106
Likes: 123
106 posts
Alliance
Priest
Alliance Priest 106 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Fantastic news. Raids are far less likely to be run as a PUG anyway, whereas for dungeons it's rather common.

I think this is the best compromise we were likely to get. Good stuff.

   teebling Gensei Araghast
Human Priest
<Pertento> [EU-PvP]


Image
Rogue Combat
User avatar
Guild:

Super Adventure Club


Posts: 198
Likes: 141
Orc Rogue 188 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Sweet! These are the kind of changes I DON'T mind! #smartchanges

Priest Holy
User avatar
Posts: 27
Likes: 19
27 posts
Alliance
Hunter
Alliance Hunter 27 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Love that Blizzard is listening to us for Classic, unlike they do for Live!

This is definitely the best way to do it.

Image Level 0 MC 0/10 BWL 0/8 ZG 0/10 AQ 0/6 0/9 Naxx 0/15
Image Level 0 MC 0/10 BWL 0/8 ZG 0/10 AQ 0/6 0/9 Naxx 0/15
Elwynn Forest
User avatar
Posts: 36
Likes: 28
Horde Rogue 36 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

That makes perfect sense

ImageImage
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Hillsbrad Foothills
User avatar
Posts: 161
Likes: 115
160 posts
Alliance
Paladin
Alliance Paladin 160 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Wow, the updates just keep coming and this is a phenomenal compromise.

Image
User avatar
Posts: 42
Likes: 20
42 posts
Alliance
Warlock
Alliance Warlock 42 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

This pleases Scheyp

Warrior Protection
User avatar
Discord:

teebling#5444


Bnet:

Teeb#2674


Posts: 1132
Likes: 2127
Orc Warrior 525 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Wasn't a big deal to begin with but this is a great compromise that completely reassures those who were worried about 5 man group-ninja stuff. It's good that they've kept it for raids where player-controlled looting systems can lead to more mis-clicks and accidents. I hope everyone is happy with this!

Druid Feral
User avatar
Discord:

Mr_Rosh#1382


Posts: 16
Likes: 14
16 posts
Alliance
Druid
Alliance Druid 16 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Good compromise on their part. Well done Blizzard!

Image
Teldrassil
User avatar
Discord:

Faendor#4087


Bnet:

Faendor#1224


Posts: 404
Likes: 194
402 posts
Night Elf
Priest
Night Elf Priest 402 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Glad to hear this. Now they could address the right-click report as well ^^

They claimed I didn't but I did...
Alterac Valley
User avatar
Discord:

Henhouse#1234


Bnet:

Henhouse#1695


Posts: 80
Likes: 58
Alliance Priest 80 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

I'm absolutely loving the communication over the past few weeks they're having with us! These weekly updates are addressing many questions we've had, and it's really been relieving to hear leading up to release.

That said, I think the change is good. I didn't mind it on 5-man groups, but I also did not think of the potential abuse they mentioned as part of their reasoning to remove it there. All in all it seems great. This will really help their support not get swamped, and also help raids continue progressing when loot mistakes happen.

Edit:
Upon reflection: wouldn't this abuse still be possible in PuG raids? Having your friends roll for you? Or does this only apply to Master Looter?

Image
User avatar
Posts: 33
Likes: 15
33 posts
Alliance
Paladin
Alliance Paladin 33 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

I'm glad they went this route. Also glad that URBS and the like are classified as dungeons and won't be eligible.

Teldrassil
User avatar
Discord:

Faendor#4087


Bnet:

Faendor#1224


Posts: 404
Likes: 194
402 posts
Night Elf
Priest
Night Elf Priest 402 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Light wrote:
4 months ago
I'm glad they went this route. Also glad that URBS and the like are classified as dungeons and won't be eligible.
Where did you get that UBRS is not classified as raid?
And they said that 5 mans won't have the loot trading.

They claimed I didn't but I did...
Ashenvale
User avatar
Posts: 7
Likes: 5
Night Elf Hunter 7 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Faendor wrote:
4 months ago
Where did you get that UBRS is not classified as raid?
And they said that 5 mans won't have the loot trading.
 Blizzard Entertainment
The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.

A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... 131586/111

   Faendor
User avatar
Posts: 33
Likes: 15
33 posts
Alliance
Paladin
Alliance Paladin 33 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Karmond wrote:
4 months ago
Faendor wrote:
4 months ago
Where did you get that UBRS is not classified as raid?
And they said that 5 mans won't have the loot trading.
 Blizzard Entertainment
The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.

A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... 131586/111
^

Eastern Plaguelands
User avatar
Posts: 299
Likes: 229
298 posts
Orc
Hunter
Orc Hunter 298 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

This is nice, I’ve never seen Blizzard so responsive like this honestly.
Getting my hopes up to be crushedTM

Image
Tanaris
User avatar
Posts: 58
Likes: 42
58 posts
Tauren
Shaman
Tauren Shaman 58 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Really good change. Great to see they are looking at the feedback and act accordingly. Would have hated loot trading the way it is in current wow in dungeons :s

Teldrassil
User avatar
Discord:

Faendor#4087


Bnet:

Faendor#1224


Posts: 404
Likes: 194
402 posts
Night Elf
Priest
Night Elf Priest 402 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Light wrote:
4 months ago
Karmond wrote:
4 months ago
Faendor wrote:
4 months ago
Where did you get that UBRS is not classified as raid?
And they said that 5 mans won't have the loot trading.
 Blizzard Entertainment
The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.

A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... 131586/111
^
Oh I've overlooked that one, nice.

They claimed I didn't but I did...
Paladin Holy
User avatar
Posts: 21
Likes: 8
Alliance 21 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Two Classic news updates almost back to back (in Blizzard time) and an announcement of a sequel to VtM: Bloodlines. This week is ending right!

   teebling
Ironforge
User avatar
Posts: 22
Likes: 13
22 posts
Alliance
Warrior
Alliance Warrior 22 posts
4 months ago (Pre-release)
4 months ago (Pre-release)
 •  Unread

Karmond wrote:
4 months ago
Faendor wrote:
4 months ago
Where did you get that UBRS is not classified as raid?
And they said that 5 mans won't have the loot trading.
 Blizzard Entertainment
The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.

A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t ... 131586/111
Best possible compromise IMO

Similar topics
to 'Loot Trading In Classic'
Posts ViewsLast post