Hunter Marksman
User avatar
EU Sulfuron
Posts: 61
Likes: 60
Horde
Hunter
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Everyone was asleep, but some of us eventually stayed awaken to bring you the fresh news !
(also because for Classic launch we will need to be fresh and ready at 12am so we have a tendancy to adapt our sleeping schedule you know...)

 Blizzard Entertainment
Bornakk
Community Manager

We’ve been closely following the community discussion around this add-on for WoW Classic, as well as analyzing it to make sure we understand how it works. After careful examination, we believe the nature of ClassicLFG is incompatible with our social design for Classic. Thus, in an upcoming patch (in the weeks following launch), we will be adding restrictions to the Classic add-on API that will significantly limit this add-on and others like it.

In line with what we shared at BlizzCon last year, we intend to be very careful about allowing add-on functionality that might undermine aspects of the social dynamics that are core to the Classic experience, even in cases like this where it’s clear that the addon author had no ill intent and was simply trying to provide a service to the Classic community. Ultimately, if a streamlined group-finding system was something we considered compatible with Classic, we would have kept the modern Premade Group Finder tool rather than choosing to remove it from the Classic client.

It’s difficult to articulate a clear-cut rule for exactly when an add-on crosses the line. However, when an add-on goes beyond presenting information or providing aesthetic customization, and attempts to create an interconnected social network that relies on other players also using that same add-on, we are likely to scrutinize it particularly closely.
Direct Link
Reddit comments

"Yesterday is history, tomorrow a mystery, but today is a gift : that's why it's called present."
Undercity
User avatar
Posts: 126
Likes: 56
Horde
Shaman
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

This kind of player driven reaction by developers is great!

   Gensei Chablo
Warlock Affliction
User avatar
US Bigglesworth
Posts: 146
Likes: 102
Alliance
Hunter
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

That's great. Feel bad for the guy who went through the trouble to develop the addon though.

Shaman Enhancement
User avatar
Posts: 379
Likes: 133
Troll
Shaman
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

DoomC wrote:
4 months ago
That's great. Feel bad for the guy who went through the trouble to develop the addon though.
I mean if his work was for something that was ultimately bad for the game, it kinda comes out in the wash.

Gensei - Shaman
Temaius - Paladin
Bloodsail Buccaneers
Silverpine Forest
User avatar
Posts: 392
Likes: 123
Undead
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Threads I've derailed: 0
Flame wars I've started: 0
Threads I've started that mentioned other posters by name: 0
Accounts I've created for the sole purpose of mocking other posters: 0

My reputation is clean.
Warrior Fury
User avatar
US Fairbanks
Posts: 1182
Likes: 780
Gnome
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Great stance by Blizz. Won't change much if there is a huge demand from players. Ultimately players have in the past and will again find a way to make group finders if they are so inclined. Sites like Openraid have existed in the past and group finder discords are bound to pop up. Just like in the private community, Discords will be a great place for players to coordinate groups. I'm inclined to say this is a bit better anyhow because it is not directly in the game and thus will be used by fewer people AND still requires more player effort and communication than an automated matchmaker. So while this is a babystep by Blizz, its a step in the right direction and I am glad that they are setting a precedent so early.

g0bledyg00k wrote:
1 month ago
Never making a single investment again until I 100% know it pays off.
2000 IQ :wink:
Druid Restoration
User avatar
OC Yojamba
Posts: 962
Likes: 770
Tauren
Druid
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Black Monarch wrote:
4 months ago
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
This explains a lot.

   Roffellos Instinctz Knoxtane Relik Kolvacs mwaf Stfuppercut
Lvl 60
Lvl 35
Orgrimmar
User avatar
Posts: 48
Likes: 19
Horde
Rogue
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Nice to hear, addons like this will keep cropping up for the first few months though so we're not done yet.

Gandling EU
Mage Frost
User avatar
EU Flamelash
Posts: 61
Likes: 45
Gnome
Mage
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

This is amazing. Of course people can find a way around it if they really want, but Blizzard saying "nono" to this is awesome.

Burning Steppes
User avatar
EU Pyrewood Village
Posts: 56
Likes: 38
Alliance
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

DoomC wrote:
4 months ago
Feel bad for the guy who went through the trouble to develop the addon though
I do not, I made a ticket warning him of this on github months ago when he was just starting out.

Collecting / parsing chat messages from /trade /lfg to facilitate you sorting through all the spam is great there were addons that did that in vanilla too (CallToArms was the most popular one)
In the private server era both CTA and vQueue fulfilled that same function. You could then manually form a group or invite the player from the usual invite or whisper menu.

Neither addon went the extra two steps of entirely automating group formation and invites so you can afk form and join groups with zero player interaction which is what this recent incarnation was poised to do.

- Blizzard said in 2005/6 that addons that facilitate cross-faction communication in-game (babelfish and similar) are a bannable offense.
- Blizzard protected movement functions from being used in addons early vanilla which broke a bunch of auto-travel addons (you could plan your whole world trip and afk while the addon walked you / mounted you to destinations and even took zeppelins and boats)
Some people still went up in arms for those.
- Blizzard warned that AVR (augmented virtual reality) goes against the intended gameplay design and would be bannable (until they found a way to break it through API)
There was still outcry ("boohoo we can't carry our bad friends through ICC anymore, why Blizzard?")

Fully automating the group formation process in Classic is akin to botting yourself into groups and they are fully in their right to discourage it or outright break it.
This is nothing new and deserves no outrage.

My only reservation is I worry what other legitimate addons might be hurt by the changes needed to remove the automation part.

PS. Creating an anti-LFG tool addon that floods the original addon with trash information is trivial so Blizzard stepping in is all around the best solution.

   teebling Vlostek PhillyOutty
[:flag_eu: :dragon: :flag_gb: :large_blue_diamond: | EU-PvE | English Speaking | Alliance | GMT+1 | Family & Work friendly | Mid-Core]
Warrior Protection
User avatar
EU Hydraxian Waterlords
Posts: 1329
Likes: 2554
Orc
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

This is interesting as its the first official statement we’ve had since they announced that they would be ‘moderating’ addons for Classic back ar Blizzcon panel 2018.

So it’s confirmed then that they have taken a stance. The question now is what rules will they draw up for separating ‘classic’ and ‘non-classic’ compatible addons? If they do at all?

Burning Steppes
User avatar
EU Pyrewood Village
Posts: 56
Likes: 38
Alliance
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

teebling wrote:
4 months ago
The question now is what rules will they draw up for separating ‘classic’ and ‘non-classic’ compatible addons? If they do at all?
Automation of gameplay is the obvious (and logical) answer one would hope.

The problem is that for example an easy way to break this addon is making the group invite function protected (= requires a hardware event, keypress/mouse).
This would keep the addon working as a chat parser / collating LFG/D chat from channels in nice lists but remove the automation part and require players to interact.

Problem is it would at the same time break a bunch of other more benign addons (some that multiboxers use, or friends/ couples to briefly go to the loo while their partner groups / puts them on follow)

[:flag_eu: :dragon: :flag_gb: :large_blue_diamond: | EU-PvE | English Speaking | Alliance | GMT+1 | Family & Work friendly | Mid-Core]
Hillsbrad Foothills
User avatar
US Sulfuras
Posts: 176
Likes: 141
Horde
Shaman
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

I'm glad they said and are doing something about it. I certainly think it would ruin the experience for Classic.

 Blizzard Entertainment
we believe the nature of ClassicLFG is incompatible with our social design for Classic.
That's the key sentence for me. I'm wanting to join in and play classic because of the social aspect of the game and community involvement. I don't want Classic to turn into a "Breezefest" like Retail is where you can just teleport anywhere, find groups anywhere and literally almost never buy anything.

Rogue Combat
User avatar
Posts: 117
Likes: 40
Alliance
Rogue
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

The fact that black monarch wanted this addon tells me a lot about him

   Knoxtane Stfuppercut
Posts: 151
Likes: 44
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Great to hear keeping dumbed down add-ons out of the game. Loving every minute of it.

Dustwallow Marsh
User avatar
EU Pyrewood Village
Posts: 20
Likes: 7
Night Elf
Druid
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Quick question:
Did Blizzard take a stance concerning "global" chat channels? You know, the famous /world /global, etc.

Come to think of it, I'm not sure if the official "Looking For Group" channel is realm or zone/level wide.
Anyone could enlighten me?

Felwood
User avatar
Posts: 185
Likes: 73
Gnome
Mage
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Personally I think it would be even better if nobody could use questie or deadly boss mods.

   powerfool
| Kazumi[33] - Frost Mage, Wetpaint[49] - Prot Warrior | Golemagg PVP|
Warlock Affliction
User avatar
US Bigglesworth
Posts: 146
Likes: 102
Alliance
Hunter
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Kazukii wrote:
4 months ago
Personally I think it would be even better if nobody could use questie or deadly boss mods.
I'd like to see DBM removed and addons in general that make raids easier, but we all know that's not going to happen :lol:

Winterspring
User avatar
Posts: 117
Likes: 50
Human
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Thank God. That's such a stupid addon and I hate everyone who condone it.

Human Warrior - Shazzrah Firemaw PVP
Winterspring
User avatar
Posts: 117
Likes: 50
Human
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Kazukii wrote:
4 months ago
Personally I think it would be even better if nobody could use questie or deadly boss mods.
Also this a hundred percent.

Human Warrior - Shazzrah Firemaw PVP
Warrior Fury
User avatar
EU Flamelash
Posts: 212
Likes: 99
Horde
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

This makes me very happy to hear. The Classic team really is on another level compared to what the Blizzard team has been for many years now.

   Selexin
Winterspring
User avatar
EU Pyrewood Village
Posts: 146
Likes: 55
Troll
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Very good to hear, hopefully there are some restrictions on DBM and alikes.

daisyKutter - Troll Protection Warrior
EU PvE - Pyrewood Village - Horde
User avatar
EU Gandling
Posts: 88
Likes: 35
Tauren
Shaman
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

It’s for the best. The whole affair was a bit oxymoronic when you think of one of the reasons people miss Vanilla so much.

   Selexin
Ashenvale
User avatar
US Bloodsail Buccaneers
Posts: 75
Likes: 29
Night Elf
Warrior
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

YES! VICTORY!

   Selexin
Arithil - Warrior Tank
Hunter Beast Mastery
User avatar
US Atiesh
Posts: 59
Likes: 12
Night Elf
Hunter
4 months ago (Beta)
 •  Unread

Good.

   Selexin

No original unarmored epic mounts :cry:
Similar topics
to 'Blue post regarding the LFG Add-on'
Posts ViewsLast post